Arguments in the cold fusion controversy - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about Arguments in the cold fusion controversy Printer Friendly
The Free Dictionary
1,017,297,967 visitors served.
?
Dictionary/
thesaurus
Medical
dictionary
Legal
dictionary
Financial
dictionary
Acronyms
 
Idioms
Encyclopedia
Wikipedia
encyclopedia
?

cold fusion
(redirected from Arguments in the cold fusion controversy)

   Also found in: Encyclopedia, Wikipedia 0.53 sec.

cold fusion

In nuclear physics, the supposed fusion of atomic nuclei at room temperature. If cold fusion were possible it would provide a limitless, cheap, and pollution-free source of energy, and it has therefore been the subject of research around the world. Few physicists believe it is possible.

In 1989 Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons of the University of Utah, USA, claimed that they had achieved cold fusion in the laboratory, but their results could not be substantiated. The University of Utah announced in 1998 that they would allow the cold fusion patent to elapse, given that the work of Pons and Fleischmann has never been reproduced.

Cold Fusion

Application server used in conjunction with a Web server to link a database to a Web site. Using its own scripting language, CFML (Cold Fusion Markup Language), the application server extracts the database information and incorporates it into a Web page each time the page is requested by a Web browser. The Web site therefore contains ‘live’ data, and does not have to be maintained separately from the database. Cold Fusion is thus particularly useful for electronic commerce (e-commerce) systems.

CFML uses a set of special markup tags that are included inside HTML documents. If CFML is included in a document, the file extension is designated as ‘.cfm’. When the Web server receives a request for a file with such an extension, it diverts the request to the Cold Fusion application server, which then assembles the required information. The information is then sent back to the Web server in HTML format, and delivered to the browser.


?Page tools
Printer friendly
Cite / link
Email
Feedback
?Sign in SSL protected
Email:
Password:
Register

? Mentioned in
 
Hutchinson browser? ? Full browser
 
Arguments
Arguments against Holocaust denial and revisionism
Arguments against the existance of bigfoot
Arguments against the existance of bigfoot
Arguments against the existeance of Bigfoot
Arguments against the existeance of Bigfoot
Arguments against the existence of a God
Arguments against the existence of Bigfoot
Arguments against the existence of Bigfoot
Arguments against the existence of god
Arguments against the existence of gods
Arguments and Facts
Arguments for and against capitalism
Arguments for and against drug prohibition
Arguments for and against of capitalism
Arguments for eternity
Arguments for God
Arguments for God's existence
Arguments for the existance of bigfoot
Arguments for the existance of bigfoot
Arguments for the existance of God
Arguments for the existence of Bigfoot
Arguments for the existence of Bigfoot
Arguments for the existence of God
Arguments in the cold fusion controversy
Arguments that the income tax is invalid
argumentum
Argumentum a divisione est fortissimum in jure
Argumentum a majori ad minus negative non valet; valet e converso
Argumentum a silentio
Argumentum a simili valet in lege
Argumentum ab authoritate est fortissimum in lege
Argumentum ab impossibili plurmum valet in lege
Argumentum ab inconvenienti
Argumentum ad absurdum
Argumentum ad absurdum
Argumentum ad absurdum
Argumentum ad antiquitam
Argumentum ad antiquitatem
Argumentum ad baculum
Argumentum ad consequentiam
Argumentum ad crumenam
Argumentum ad feminam
Argumentum ad hominem
Argumentum ad hominem
Argumentum ad hominum
Argumentum ad hominum
Argumentum ad ignorantiam
Argumentum ad ignorantium
 
Hutchinson Encyclopedia
?

Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Feedback | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc.
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.. Terms of Use.