Fullilove v. Klutznick - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about Fullilove v. Klutznick Printer Friendly
Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary
3,578,489,508 visitors served.
forum Join the Word of the Day Mailing List For webmasters
?
Dictionary/
thesaurus
Medical
dictionary
Legal
dictionary
Financial
dictionary
Acronyms
 
Idioms
Encyclopedia
Wikipedia
encyclopedia
?

Fullilove v. Klutznick

   Also found in: Wikipedia 0.02 sec.

Fullilove v. Klutznick

US Supreme Court decision of 1980 dealing with the constitutionality of Congressional legislation allocating a certain percentage of public works contracts to minority-owned businesses. Fullilove, a white business owner, filed suit against the government, arguing that the Public Works Employment Act, a bill that required states to use at least 10% of federal public works funds to hire minority businesses, was racially discriminatory. The Court found that the act was not a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment but a remedial measure intended to enforce the equal protection clause. Congress, according to a 6–3 decision, was within its rights to use control over federal funds for the legitimate goal of reversing racial discrimination.



How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content.
?Page tools
Printer friendly
Cite / link
Feedback
?Sign in SSL protected
Email:
Password:
Register

Mentioned in?  References in periodicals archive?   Hutchinson browser?   Full browser?
No references found
 
In so doing, she was required to distinguish or overrule Fullilove v.
For a recent and well-known example of this, see the progression from Fullilove v.
 
 
 
Hutchinson Encyclopedia
?

Terms of Use | Privacy policy | Feedback | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc.
Disclaimer
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.