Lochner v. New York - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about Lochner v. New York Printer Friendly
Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary
1,753,748,612 visitors served.
forum mailing list For webmasters
?
New: Language forums
Dictionary/
thesaurus
Medical
dictionary
Legal
dictionary
Financial
dictionary
Acronyms
 
Idioms
Encyclopedia
Wikipedia
encyclopedia
?

Lochner v. New York

   Also found in: Legal, Wikipedia 0.01 sec.

Lochner v. New York

US Supreme Court decision of 1905 dealing with the use of state police power to regulate working conditions. Lochner, an owner of a bakery convicted of violating a New York law that set maximum working hours for bakery workers, filed suit against the state. The US Supreme Court voted narrowly to overrule the New York law, ruling it an excessive use of state police power that violated the Fourteenth Amendment right to freedom of contract.

Dissenting, Justice Holmes criticized the majority ruling for making its decision because of a belief in laissez-faire economics.



How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content.
?Page tools
Printer friendly
Cite / link
 Email
Feedback
?Sign in SSL protected
Email:
Password:
Register

? Mentioned in ? References in periodicals archive
No references found
 
for example, wrote perhaps the most devastating dissent in Supreme Court history in Lochner v.
Justice Scalia as judicial statesman by Bramwell, Austin W. / Modern Age
In 1937, as Roosevelt's crowning legal victory, the Supreme Court overruled Lochner v.
Bad deal: how FDR made life worse for African Americans by Root, Damon W. / Reason
More results
 
Hutchinson browser? ? Full browser
 
 
Hutchinson Encyclopedia
?

Disclaimer | Privacy policy | Feedback | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc.
All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional. Terms of Use.